Kevin Vance - Namedrop

Entries | Archive | Friends | Friends' Friends | User Info

07:55 pm


Friday, March 28th, 2003
Previous Entry Share Next Entry
zixyer's idea worked!

Most of you will find the explanation to the previous statement to be (as) boring (as the rest of this week's posts). So before I start, point your browser at the Handhelj proto-site and tell me how it renders, what your OS is, and what your browser is. It probably won't look right on a lot of stuff, because this is my first try at using CSS for "real" layout. No tables. I already know from kartos that it's broken (but still usable) in OmniWeb.

Now, about this latest bug:

Every Java object I create in C++ now gets added to a singleton object whose only purpose is to reference Java objects created in C++. Because the object's only instance is created in Java, all the stuff it references will be noticed by Java's garbage collector. I didn't get this at first, because I had never seen the concept of a "singleton object" before. So, thanks zixyer! A few more tests, and the pilot-link conduit should be finished.

Going back over my TODO list, I see that there are still some unresolved bugs from beta1. Might be tricky to figure those out. Though gregw will be pleased to know that when you type in a mood, it jumps to the closest match in the list, just like the address book.
Link )Reply )

[User Picture]From: nonexistent
2003-03-28 05:52 pm (UTC)
Site looks fine to me (on Win2KPro SP2 using Mozilla 1.3a).
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: suppafly
2003-03-28 07:10 pm (UTC)

looks nice in win2k with IE 5.5

how are you finding using css for layout? I've been trying to bring myself to design a page with css, but a lot of the stuff isn't supported in various browsers so you end having to do that making different hacks for different browser's bullshit like it was 1990.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: kvance
2003-03-28 09:35 pm (UTC)

Re: looks nice in win2k with IE 5.5

I like the idea a lot. Actually using an unorderd list for the navigation options, or actually using H# tags for headings is way cool. I didn't run into too many problems, but that's because (1) my design is pretty simple, and (2) I only targetted Mozilla and IE6. But if I actually had a responsibility to a customer to make the design work everywhere... well then CSS is useless :P
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: gregw
2003-03-28 09:58 pm (UTC)


And the site looks great - I'm using Mozilla 1.2.1 on Mac OS 9.2.2

(Reply) (Thread)